slatestarcodex autism

Let me write toy model, where intelligence Q is a function f of all heritable biological parameters that could possibly affect brain function (let us say, all possible variants of human genes in a DNA sequence of certain base pair length), denoted by g_1, , g_n. It would not surprise me if a lot of non-neurotypical children were doing similar things, and that it poses genuine problems for studies like those discussed above. Genes are not something where you can say, this is good, more of it will be better. Other interesting question if the Flynn effect is more important than genetics and our mean IQ is 15 points higher than 100 years ago: where are all the geniuses? Maybe this is a tower collapse event. You mentioned height, which I think is a good example too we have studies (possibly not good ones) showing that taller people have better outcomes, get treated nicer, are more attractive but people who get too tall have bad medical problems, shorter life expectancy. control children (though see the discussion here) for some debate over how seriously to take this; I am less sure this is accurate than most of the other statistics mentioned here. n=1 description of autism and speculation on etiology. my kid who is on the spectrum is 12 and ok functioning (doing well in middle school) i cant imagine what would get us into the therapist office to do an IQ test. I am known as a word smith (and its an important part of my career, but Im not in journalism). Overall I would be surprised if this were the real explanation for the autism-and-intelligence paradox, but it gets an A for effort. Well, I think its certainly a reasonable possibility, which in my experience appears to be true, that beyond a certain point, intelligence either directly causes weirdness or is reliant upon it as a foundation. And that finds that only 15% have intellectual disabilities. >They are being positively selected, ie increasing with every generation, presumably because people with the genes are having more children than people without them. and b) people diagnosed with autism using current criteria are quite prevalent in the community and presumably functioning in their communities. Arizone State University Autism symptoms reduced nearly 50% two years after fecal transplant Commentary: The autistic community is having a reckoning with ABA About 13% of autistic children (in this sample from whatever social stratum they took their sample from) have fathers who are engineers, compared to only 5% of a group of (presumably well-matched?) This would be a more useful post if it addressed this change in terminology. Based on those two correlations, I would be very surprised if it didnt add up to a correlation between predisposition for autism and children later in life. Aspergers was definitionally distinguished from autism due to a lack of the cognitive deficits associated with that condition, but in 2013, the DSM-5 folded it into autism spectrum disorders, so this could make it difficult to analyse the genes of high function autistics if that was the mistake I believe it was. Being able to observe a large variety of children with autism (due to activities at the charter school), I agree that autism is a very strange catch-all with many different types of children diagnosed. You underestimate the potential of a good emulation, I think. The tower model looks close to my personal model, which has absolutely no experimental testing besides how the two of us feel about itbut generally I call it the Smore model. Intelligence is clearly not a neat and predictable thing, at least beyond certain broad generalizations or thresholds. 9 6 5 4 3 marries 9 2 5 4 3, children high chance of 10+ on first and autistic, children that are not autistic are just barely on the bright side of normal. High-functioning autism looks more like the same polygenetic soup one finds with other complex personality characteristics like intelligence or Big Five character traits. They propose that the reason evolution favors autism genes is that they generally increase intelligence. Anyway, if the data were there, I would suggest an alternate explanation that a significant portion of gender dysphoria is socially mediated, and the autistic are isolated from the social phenomenon. My problem with this kind of model is that some people are geniuses but dont have autism. While autism (and Asperger) has a lot of symptoms, there is one thing I noticed early on: people on the spectrum tend to take words very literally. Normal includes insecurities, anxieties, caring what other people think. Most of these seem to be related to social ability. AISafety.com hosts a Skype reading group Wednesdays at 19:45 UTC, reading new and old articles on different aspects of AI Safety. If e.g. These mutations are often very bad, and are quickly selected out of the gene pool (because the people who have them dont reproduce). Intelligence may be very much the same way. For example, they are not extremely aggressive, but tend to be gentle individuals. But there is a critical point in the system, the feedback point, after which more isnt just too much of a good thing the behavior of the system changes qualitatively and the whole thing breaks down. Agree with your post, and especially with this part. Now there is a very strong effect towards their fathers being less intelligent than usual. I suspect a lot of people who answered the survey were giving scores from IQ tests they took as children, or from internet tests of dubious quality. One possibility would be something like a tower-vs-foundation model. Slate Star Codex was a blog by Scott Alexander about human cognition, politics, and medicine. Because theres a correlation between IQ and race, overdiagnosing the children of a higher IQ group with autism (or underdiagnosing the children of a lower IQ group with autism) results in a correlation between IQ and autism which is actually just caused by racial bias in diagnosis rates. But you know what really has provided a massive survival advantage over the last few millenia of people clumping up together in cities? By the same rationale, you could say that no one is normal, and everyone is simply running a mental emulation. Giftedness makes people more idiosyncratic. If you have too many, your legs are bizarrely long twigs that you totter around on like a newborn giraffe, and youve just gone to far so you wont be a great runner. Other times, the conversations would seem weird as hell in most placesdiscussions of physics or evolution or game theory or genetics or whatever, with a high background level of assumed knowledge. We dont have all those variants identified yet, but from the fraction we do know and the rate of change, they estimate that genetic potential for IQ is dropping about 0.30 point per decade 3 points per century, about a point a generation. Assortative Mating And Autism | Slate Star Codex These are the people that make the Turing test invalid, youd think they were the chatbot. Isnt autism a bit more sensitive to increased parental age than many other mental disorders? At times she has been productively employed in a technological field.

Beacon Brevard Login, Tuscola County Friend Of The Court Guidelines, Salima Ikram Husband Photos, Australian Fashion Bloggers Over 30, Who Is Russell Faraday In The Stand, Articles S