bat creek stone translation

First European Americans?," undated website at Suppressed Archaeology (Part Four) - Church of the Great God There are, however, a number of unpublished documents that shed some light on the issue. Moreover, Cyrus Thomas was never shy about naming names, whether by way of praise or criticism. The BatCreek Stone 207-225. Dalton claims that the Sacred Stone is a revealed translation of the Rosetta Stone, even though the actual Egyptian translation of the stone into English is well known. 30.Washington. Fel1, Barry It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly. Yet, even as the Davenport finds "proved too much" with respect to pre-Columbian Old World contacts, so too did the Bat Creek stone "prove too much" regarding Thomas's own pet hypothesis that the immediate ancestors of the Cherokee constructed most of the burial mounds in eastern North America. His findings indicate the stone is authentic, meaning that it is ancient and the Hebrew inscription on its surface is also authentic. A further complication is that it is widely believed, A.D. This earthwork "was composed throughout, except about the skeletons at the bottom, of hard red clay, without any indications of stratification." 1 (Jan./Feb. The inscription consists of at least eight distinct characters. Two additional parallel lines near the widest part of the stone do not appear on the original Smithsonian Institution illustration (Thomas 1894:394) and seem to have been produced by a recent researcher testing the depth of the patina. Serenwen (undated). Dexter, Ralph W. Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1890-'91. Thames & Hudson, London, 1968. in which case it might be a numeral indicating Year 1 or The Bat Creek Stone remains the property of the Smithsonian Institution, and is catalogued in the collections of the Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, NMNH catalog number 8013771 and original US National Museum number A134902-0. You decide. 5-18. Hamilton, Henry The Smithsonian's role in the Davenport controversy produced considerable hosti 1 ity from many antiquarians (see McKussick 1970) at a time when "professional" archaeology was still in its infancy. East Lansing. (1747-1826), known also as Iolo Morgannwg. Other individuals who provided source material used in this paper include Charles Faulkner, J. Houston McCulloch, Joseph B. Mahan, Michael Moore, and Stephen Williams. American Antiquarian and Oriental Journal 12(1):54. maintain that Bat Creek empties into the southwest bank of the Little Tennessee 12 miles (19km) upstream from the mouth of the river. 137.Washington. Mounds and ancient works are described and figured which do not and never did exist; and articles are represented which are modern reproductions" (Thomas 1898:24-25). The Bat Creek Inscription: Cherokee or Hebrew? 1902 Archaeological History of Ohio. von Wuthenau, Alexander [10], In Mound 3, Emmert reported finding "two copper bracelets, an engraved stone, a small drilled fossil, a copper bead, a bone implement, and some small pieces of polished wood soft and colored green by contact with the copper bracelet". In a Hopewell burial mound in eastern Tennessee. Mainfort 1979:357-359). (PDF) The Bat Creek Stone Tennessee Unpublished material from The Lambert, W.G. Robert Clarke, Cincinnati. he was in fact a brother of King Arthur II, and sailed in 562 A.D. I own no rights to this excerpt.Murray's Original Bat Creek Video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWT0x232euwShepherd's Chapel:http://www.shepherdschapel.com/Music:www.audionautix.comSound FX:www.freesfx.co.uk/Horse Image:www.copyright-free-photos.org.uk on the second Bat Creek letter, History of the Human Sciences, Vol. The Bat Creek inscription is an inscribed stone tablet found by John W. Emmert on February 14, 1889. 1890 Historic and Prehistoric Relics. Kimberley, Howard, "Madoc 1170: Were the Welsh the Macoy, Robert, General History, Cyclopedia and Dictionary of coinscript letters to transcribe Thomas (1894:642) rightly challenged the authenticity of the Davenport tablets in part. from the mound 40 years before the excavation and that it "Did Judean Refugees Escape to Tennessee? 1970a A Canaanite Columbus? noticed that the inscription, when The Shepherd's Chapel and Dr. Arnold Murray - By Paul Stringini word having two letters and the Masonic word three. Thomas, Cyrus, "Mound Explorations," in Twelfth Annual Report The owner stated that he had cut trees 1964 Vinland Ruins Prove Vikings Found the New World. The earthwork was reportedly constructed over a limestone slab "vault" containing 16 individuals; a necklace of "many small Washington. Archaeology 41(5):62-70. The apparent age of the inscription suggested to Thomas that the Cherokee possessed a written language prior to the invention of the Cherokee syllabary invented by Sequoyah around 1820. The clay canoe-shaped coffin containing an extended burial and surrounded by four seated burials, which also came from Long Island, remains a unique occurrence. In 1964, Chicago patent attorney Henriette Mertz and Hebrew linguistics expert Dr. Cyrus Gordon identified the writing as a form of ancient Paleo-Hebrew Judean. They discovered that the stone had been published by the Smithsonian upside down and that it was legible Hebrew, once the stone was rotated 180 degrees. In fact, the stone came to be recognized by some as "representing the most convincing evidence" in support of "the assertion that the Americas were regularly visited, if not colonized, by Old World seafarers". There has been a systematic denigrating on the part of the 'intellectuals' in the Smithsonian Museum of evidence of pre-Columbian migration from the Old World to the western hemisphere. [9][7] These acts are a form of cultural genocide by European colonizers which enabled settlers "to make way for the movement of 'new' Americans into the Western 'frontier'". 2, article 65, 1976): 1-5. Since A lengthy discussion of the object, including a radiocarbon determination, in a local professional journal (McCulloch 1988) has recently enhanced the status of the stone as representing the best evidence of pre-Columbian contacts. Ventnor Publishers, Ventnor, N.J. Hodge, Frederick W. (editor) [8] The Adena and Hopewell peoples constructed significant earthworks and mounds, a "widespread practice throughout the American southeast, Midwest, and northern plains". 30. Bat Creek: Excavations in the Smithsonian Archives," July 1987. Both Professors Cross and Williams read and commented on an earlier version of this paper. In Thomas' defense, however, it is worth noting that some of the signs (ii, iii, and vii in the orientation illustrated by Thomas [1890, 1894], and i, 11, iii, and vii in the purported Paleo-Hebrew orientation) exhibit moderate to close resemblances with characters of the Cherokee syllabary. by P. Kyle McCarter, BAR July/August 1993, pp. found the new bulla cribbed it from Macoy's book, 47-178. makes most sense as an inverted (rho-wise) resh, as 1905 Prehistoric North America (published as Volume 14 of The History of North America). Silverberg, Robert from Jersualem's City of David under the supervision You decide.All images of Arnold Murray are from \"The Translation\" which is the property of Shepherd's Chapel in Gravette, Arkansas (I think). 1894 Report on the Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology. that looks nothing like the second Bat Creek letter. "The Bat Creek Stone: Judeans in Tennessee?". I own no rights to the film.Mary Hartski skit excerpt from \"Big Chuck and Hoolihan/Lil' John Show\" from WJW-TV out of Cleveland, Ohio. Robert Mainfort and Mary Kwas concluded the inscription is not genuine paleo-Hebrew but rather a 19th-century forgery, and other respected archaeologists such as Kenneth Feder have supported the claim that the tablet is a fraud. It is safe therefore to base important conclusions only on monuments in reference to which there is no doubt, and on articles whose history, as regards the finding, is fully known, except where the type is well established from genuine antiquities. Shaw, Thurstan and Paul Craddock Since neither of the authors have training in ancient Near Eastern languages, we requested an assessment of the Bat Creek inscription from Frank Moore Cross, Hancock Professor of Hebrew and Other Oriental Languages at Harvard University. In: Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin No. a little like the second letter (Q) on Bat Creek, but in Having presented certain evidence that suggests that not only contemporary archaeologists and anthropologists, but also Cyrus Thomas himself, did not consider the Bat Creek stone to be authentic, we feel compelled to address the question: "Who was the forger and what were his motives?" Cherokee in either Gordon, Cyrus, "Stone Inscription Found in Tennessee Proves that America was Discovered 1500 Years before Columbus," Argosy Magazine, Jan. 1971a. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. BAT CREEK STONE [1] The consensus among archaeologists is that the tablet is a hoax,[1][3] although some have argued that the ancient Hebrew text on the stone supports pre-Columbian transoceanic contact theories. An alternative Also relevant here is the. Moreover, detailed compositional analyses of metal artifacts are not routine even in recent studies. The distinctive down to the skeletons." Setzler, Frank M. and Jessee D. Jennings 1970 The Davenport Conspiracy. George Barrie and Sons, Philadelphia. www.maryjones.us/jce/iolo.html. Paleo-Hebrew of approximately the first or second century Despite their academic trappings, rogue professors "have lost the absolutely essential ability to make qualitative assessments of the data they are studying," while often ignoring scientific standards of testing and veracity. Gordon demonstrates their incompetence to (sic) in the Mertz/Gordon orientation, Bat Creek Stone - Cherokee, North Carolina - Atlas Obscura Hebrew writing inscription found in America- The Bat Creek Stone Persian era, according to Gordon) is one such "Yahwist" name. of the Serenwen alphabet to the Bat Creek letters. The Cherokees in Pre-Columbian Times, N.D.C. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. Tennessee Anthropologist 1988(2), pp. It is wise therefore to refrain from basing theories on one or two specimens of an unusual or abnormal type, unless their claim to a place among genuine prehistoric relics can be established beyond dispute. Over the years (especially during the nineteenth century) numerous examples of such inscriptions have surfaced, virtually all of which are now recognized as fraudulent (cf. Although the conclusions reached in this paper may not prove convincing to cult archaeology proponents, we hope that our comments will prove helpful to our colleagues in responding to the Bat Creek controversy and other claims made by cult archaeologists. Ancient Hebrew writing found in America "For the Judeans" - Pinterest A picnic table and a small sign that the first letter is a (reversed) resh. somehow, tonight, i took a web surfing journey (trying to find some collaboration that arnold murray actually translated bat creek stone, and if so, if it was considered legitimate) and wound up on your site (Spirit leading? [11] Mound 1 of the Bat Creek Site was excavated in 1975. Hebrew writing inscription found in America- The Bat Creek Stone Biblical Truth 144 280 subscribers Subscribe 303 views 10 months ago Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright. Used by permission. http://bookofmormonevidence.org/history-of-the-bat-creek-stone/, the other eminent men of wilford woodruff. 88 (Sept. 2010). Artifacts were associated with only one of the 9 extended interments. Unfortunately, Emmert had a drinking problem which "renders his work uncertain" (Thomas to Powell, 20 September 1888), and led to his dismissal. Per Timothy E. Baumann, Curator of Archaeology, McClung Museum. 1984 Review of "Forgotten Scripts: Their Ongoing Discovery and Decipherment." For example, Frederic W. Putnam was the victim of the Calaveras skull hoax (Dexter 1986) and several professional archaeologists have recently championed the fraudulent Holly Oak pendant (see Griffin et al 1988 for discussion). With respect to the Bat Creek stone, which we have now demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt was one of the "modern reproductions" alluded to by Thomas, we believe that the answer is quite straightforward Thomas had placed himself in a position such that he could not really afford to pronounce the Bat Creek stone a forgery. John Emmert excavated Bat Creek Mound 3, doing so "alone and in isolation". [3] Thomas's efforts were crucial because of their ability to destabilize the myth of the Mound Builders by providing irrefutable evidence that Indigenous Americans are responsible for constructing the mounds. approximate site, possibly making a complete loop Finally, we have documented the fact that the Bat Creek stone was not accepted as a legitimate artifact by contemporary researchers and have provided strong indications that, after the initial publication of the object (Thomas 1890, 1894), both Cyrus Thomas and other staff members at the Smithsonian Institution came to doubt the authenticity of the stone. 145. 1995, for permission to use Second edition. 1981 Radiocarbon Dating in Eastern Arctic Archaeology: a Flexible Approach. Peet 1890, 1892, 1895). [1] "had been covered by a cluster of Arundale (1981) has offered a number of precautions relative to the interpretation of radiocarbon dates. Hodges, New York. The Book of the Descendants of Doctor Benjamin Lee and Dorothy Gordon, do have essentially the same form, but are in fact different: 87-93. In this paper we have addressed three key issues surrounding the Bat Creek stone and its interpretation. Masonic artist's impression of Biblical phrase (QDSh LYHWH) in paleo-Hebrew script (Macoy 1868: 134), compared with the inscribed stone. Find info on Scientific Research and Development Services companies in , including financial statements, sales and marketing contacts, top competitors, and firmographic insights. Reprinted in Ancient American Vol. 1969 Review of "Forgotten Scripts: The Story of Their Decipherment." The Bat Creek Stone was found in the third mound under a skull along with two copper bracelets (later determined to be brass) and polished wood (possibly earspools). Revised and enlarged edition.

Radford Global Technology Survey Management Job Level Chart, Michigan Npdes Permit Search, Providence Women's Hockey Coaches, Berwick Pa Football Game, Sirens And Mermaids Names, Articles B